VFX3 Price error
we have many invoices stuck in vfx3 due to price error, can someone give some advise to investigate
Moderator Message: Don't post your main query as subject line. Your subject line should be precise and effective, for better visibility and quicker response.
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash
Hi All,
The credit limit for a customer has been set to 100000 and the customer outstanding is 110000.
The customer has made a down payment of 70000.Now the outstanding should come down to 40000 but the problem is that even after receiving the payment and the subsequent FI entries the credit outstanding is not getting updated and is still showing as 110000.
What can be the problem.
Someone please help.
Hi Team,
In a delivery 10000(product) Line 120 from SO 1234 has been invoiced on 22nd March where billing block was removed on 18th February and for the same configuration got invoiced on 18th Feb itself however the delivery got invoiced almost after one month.
Please let me know the reason for the same why document got invoiced after one month..
Thanks
Moderator Remarks: Please use effective subject line to represent your discussion. This would help your discussion with better visibility & quicker response.
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash
Hi,
I have created a Sales order for TCS and want to populate Business Place in Billing Document. However, no field is available for the same. Some times people use business area as a deriving factor for the same with the code - GGB1. In our case, we are not using Business area as well. Is there any other war for the same. Please suggest.
Hi. i am currently faced with an issue where i have 2 different output types that i want to process successfully upon creating an invoice but the 1st output type that is processed in the invoice is the one successful. adding a different output type would fail. no processing log on this one though. i have checked the Output determination procedure in NACE and both of them are added in the procedure and the config is also correct. checking the requirement types, there is no problem too. can anyone suggest if there is a SAP standard program that hinders the 2nd output type processing if the invoice already has 1?
When a billing documen is saved shows an error regrading to an incosistency between the document date (29.04.2013)) and the last assigned date (29.04.2030).
To correct:
I enter in the header and change the billing date and in the level item, Serv. rendered date was change, too.
Both dates 29/04/2013.
After that, document pass to FI.
But this is just a partial solution, becuase the system continues getting the year 2030, for all invoices generated, since yeasterday.
This is so strange for me.
I've read some of your comments in other answers and I've reviewed dates, and all seems to be ok.
I'm a basic user, So, I'don have access to customizing things
The keyuser don't have any idea =(
For now, we are just correcting manually this invoices to be able to pass to FI
Please, help me into this strange issue.
Thanks!
We have tooling cost invoice, where in the tool cost per piece will be maintained in the condition type master. and when invoice is raised the piece rate for the invoice quantity will be calculated and based on which ed,cess willbe calculated.
We need to fix a control that for certain quantity alone the tool cost price to be calculated after which the rate should be picked as 0. Do we have any user exit or is there any config changes required.
Two output types are available in the system:
ZRD0
ZRD1
The first has been available for some time and has been working correctly to default as generate output when document is created.
New requirement for new form was configured for ZRD1. The output determination was configured for the new output and VV32 updated by BillTo so it will geneate ZRD1. When the document is saved, it continues to print out the ZRD0. What configuration is missing so that it will print the ZRD1?
Thank you,
Bela
Hi,
we are using credit card process and have a scenario, I understand as standard process in credit card process the accounting document generated will have a debit and a credit entry for the customer account. The issue is when there are multiple deliveries against one order and while invoicing if i invoice VF01 with single Delivery eg 100$ then in the accounting document the customer is debited and credited (100$+ and 100$ -),
customer acct-xyz 100$
customer acct-xyz 100$- (minus)
But in case iam clubbing 2 deliveries against the same order and the value of the two deliveries are 50$ for 1st and 200$ for second delivery, when i bill these 2 deliveries with VF01, the accounting document generates two entries for each of the delivery. it shows up as\
customer acct-xyz 50$
customer acct-xyz 200$
customer acct-xyz 50$- (minus)
customer acct-xyz 200$- (minus)
Can someone help me in understanding if this is the standard behaviour / process for multiple deliveries combined in one credit card invoice.
Regards
Hi,
SAP is presently allowing me to generate invoice prior PGI is performed. Could you please guide how should I restrict this in copy control settings? Also, once invoice is generated before PGI, it triggers revenue generation too. I want to restrict this and bring in between a proforma invoice after delivery instead of invoice. What should I do? Will that stop revenue generation?
Thanks for your expert suggestion/comments.
hi experts,
can anyone tell me the way to get amount from customer to vendor in intercompany billing. because both accounting should be clear one.
regards
tony
Dear sd gurus i have one doubt regarding payment terms
we maintain payment terms in customer master in company code level and sales org level..
and in vk11 also if we maintain vk11 system is taking payment terms only from vk11 not in customer master level
if we not maintained in vk11 then system will take from customer master sales area
then my doubt is what is use of maintaining payment terms in company code level ?
thanks a lot
Hi,
This discussion is raise in reference to an existing discussion
- Example of RVAB02 PP from IDES
rasied by Vaishnavi Tangirala
Hi
Can anyone give me an example of how RVAB02 PP works from IDES? I want an example how accounting entries look like for Sales price inclusive of tax.
I have a problem now that tax code is not getting copied to the Revenue line in accounting doc since iam calculating tax on gross price and not on price after tax.
I will be very grateful for any help regarding this.
Thanks,
Vaishnavi
May I know how was this issue resolved? I am encountering the same problem now.
Thanks,
Leng
Message highlighted in blue was edited & added by: Jyoti Prakash
Hello,
Could someone teach me the setps to implement a multi-level intercompany billing?
We have implemented a simple intercompany billing, but now we need a new intermedary company. Is it possible?
Thanks in advance,
Ricard.
Hi Gurus,
we would like to clean up our rebate agreements.
We found really old ones that are still open.No we would like to close them, without creating FI/CO postings or at minimun FI/CO neutral postings.
These rebate agreements are not up to date, still carry accrual information inside 8although the accounts are cleared) and update with VBOF is required. In fact the accrual postings have already been cleared from FI side.
If I now update these agreements with VBOF, a lot of FI/CO - relevant postings - accruals -are created (although not wanted).
I found out that if I create a final invoice for the agreement , create a cancellation and add reason for rejection to the bonus request, the agreement stays in status 'D'.
The next step in testing was to delete the bonus agreement, it is set to status 'C' and a bonus request is created. Invoicing and cancellation of this invoice. But then the information ' agreement is not updated' still occurs.
VBOF is not possible.
My question now is, is there a a possibility to influence the update information of the agreement without creating postings?
Or if the agreement is on status 'D' but not updated, has this any impact on archiving of bonus agreements,invoices later on, performance of SDBONT06...?
Please advise
Best regards
Biko
Hello all,
We are facing an issue with contracts with periodic billing.
Through VF04, when we are doing the billing for item 10 and 1st period successfully, now when we come to VA43 to see the contract details. For the Item 10 the Net value for the billing is not considering the Billed period.
Ex: period 1 value is 100 and same value (100) till period 10.
Now since we have done the billing for period 1 , the net value is shown has 900 instead of 1000.
Please suggest how to fix, any BAPI or program where this calculation is done .
hi
i hv set flag at billing type level.
Delivery item text as above.still item text not copy to billing from del.
plz asist
Dear friends/experts,
In a case where in, I will have to configure/integrate with FI in such a way that, when a proforma invoice is generated post PGI, provisional revenue to get generated. I know this is unusual interms of revenue generation in proforma invoicing! But, that is how it has to be and it is just provisional revenue!
I have learnt that, a provisional G/L would be created. Requirement is that, after proforma invoicing, provisional accounting must happen as below;
Debit-Provisional Invoice Amount & Credit-To sale (just provisional and it will not affect customer).
After the approval of the proforma invoice, the above debit&credit will be knocked off (reversed).
Then, when billing is done, actual invoice will be processed. (Debit-customer account & Credit-revenue G/L).
Kindly suggest expert thoughts and suggestions on;
1. Is the provisional accounting (Debit-Provisional Invoice Amount & Credit-To sale) is possible after proforma invoicing? Please elaborate.
2. How SD consultant will play his part interms of integration with FI to make this? What all configuration is required?
Thanks,
Vish
As shown in image, wn i put text for line item as shown in part 1 in delivery , it is not copied to billing doc.
But as shown in part 2, wn i maintain text for item 900001 in delivery doc, then it is copied to billing item text.
System should consider both items as one line item shown in part 1, and text should be copied. what could be solun ? sachin k
