Hi all,
with the new decree no. 55/2013 the Italian Economic and Finance Minister require the use of electronic invoices for any organisation invoicing a public sector entity in Italy.
Do you know if SAP has already or will issue an adjustment to fulfill the decree no. 55/2013?
Regards.
Hi,
I activated the Billing plan (Milestone) at sales order level and all config done. When i go to sales order header and put the billing date, all details flow correctly (like Date desc - 0009, Billing rule - 05, billing type - FAZ) but when i enter amount, it is Not getting updated in Net value (which appears in top of billing plan Tab). I have assigned cond type AZWR also. So i am getting error while creating Invoice. My item cat here is TAN. have maintained all copy control.
Same if try at item level by changing item cat TAO and assigning billing plan details here.....its working fine.
Can you please let me know if any specific config settings needs to be done to make it happen at order level.
Thanks in advance.....
Hello experts,
we have one urgent issue to be resolved. There are around 1500 Intercompany invoices which have been created after month close (on 29 july) instead of correct time. and hence there is a huge differnece in reconcillation. any possible solution to change the billing date in exising documents ? or may be adviced to do the necessary corrections. Bit urgent and lost.
thanks
Jignesh
Hi All,
Can you please let me know how we can manage Free Goods Determination based on Sales Order value instead of Qty (which is std).
My scenario is "Exclusive". If the SO value is Rs 1lac get 10 items of Material XXX free.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance......
How do we issue credit note when We have an issue here Origin plant is Closed and with no inventory and all the materials are marked for deletion, we do not want to activate the materials again in Closed Plant plant ( Plant A).
Instead we want to receive the goods returns in another plant ( Plant B) and issue credit note to customer. we don't want to do the STO as it requires to re activate the materials in original plant A ( which has been closed).
I have gone through these threads
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1864737
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1942686
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1820565
If Anyone else faced with the same problem before?
What is the implication when we receive return in another plants?
What are the best practice?
Best Regards
Hrusikesh
Hello Experts,
We have order related intercompany invoices and today found strange behaviour that few of the intercompany invoices are not at all created that also very few documents fond affected not all. I have seen RDIV output has been successfully processed but intercompany invoice (IVA) is still missing in document flow.
May I know what may be the reason and if something stops to create IVA, Can I see the logs somewhere..Please help. I tried to find the exising posts but no luck.
Thanks
Jignesh
Hi ,
I am new to this blog my question is
Whether its possible to create external number range for Billing document?
If possible tell me the process? because I have checked in in Billing document type there its showing only internal number range there is no option of external number range
plz help me out
Thanks in advance
Muraligopi.Y
Dear Friends,
Need an information. I believe, if there is a pricing reference material listed in material master data, then the condition record should necessarily be referring to pricing reference material.
I have come across a scenario, even though the sales order line item "material" has a pricing reference material for it against which usually condition record would be maintained, I need to maintain the record for the actual material despite of the presence of pricing reference material.
Now, as there is a reason why pricing reference material given in master data, I would like to know is it possible to maintain the condition record for the line item material without removing reference material from master data.
If possible, how to achieve this possibility.
Thanks,
Vishwanath
Dear sd experts
I have one requirement may be i am i am thing i can achieve this by doing transaction variant only
ex i have created so many billing documents now my clinte wants to see which invoice documents value is more than 35000 rs
any Alternative method is there in sap
Thanks a lot
Hi
We have new scenario. In one state , there is additional tax called market fee on Basic price. Also there is VAT on basic price.
Pls tell me how to configure additional tax to get proper output.
Regards,
Sachin K
Hi Experts,
I am very new in VFX3 tcode and i have an issue .After Executing VFX3 tcode with required data i get this kind of error log.
Am not able to understand how to resolve this error.
Thanks,
Kunal Leo
Hi experts,
We have implemented stock transfer process between our two plants at different locations.
The delivery documents are created using tcode : VL10B from Purchase orders.
These delivery documents are present in the VF04 billing due list.
Now after we create Billing documents(Pro forma/Excise invoices) from these Delivery documents, they still appear in VF04 billing due list.
So kindly suggest what configurations to be done in order to remove these Delivery documents from VF04 list.
Thanks,
Vishal
Hi,
My business is facing one issue where the Net value of contract is some 3800 KWD. and the milestone billing net value is 3500 Kwd.
I don't understand why this issue of price difference has come now. I checked other documents in SE16 (VBAK table) with same document type and billing type, they are picking the same value. No data inconsistency found.
Please guide what could be the reason?
I tried to cancel the billing document and redo the billing, then in update button select option D.
But that option it self is not available!
Hi Experts
We are facing one issue related to condition record determination for the first line item in a billing document. The billing document is a credit note for a return sales order. The condition type has been marked as mandatory in the pricing procedure so we are getting Pricing Error: Mandatory condition YY01 is missing.
The condition record however does exist and when we click on update to redetermine the pricing it gets picked up. Also the condition record is directly getting picked up for the second line item in the billing document (Both products are same). How come it is not getting picked for the first item by default.? We have checked the pricing routines as well and we couldn't find anything wrong there. What could be the issue?
Any help or pointers will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Rajat
Dear Experts,
Please help me set-up the EU triangulation deal for one of my EU client.
As per client's definition of EU triangulation:
Triangulation refers to a any situation where goods move form EU country to another and a third party in the transaction is based elsewhere (either in or out of the EU)
Therefore another current example we have, the goods are going to France, but we are invoicing Japan, the Japanese customer has a French VAT registration recorded in SAP Master Data.
Therefore this is also an EU triangulation sale.
My question to you:
I can see there is a check box in SO header -> billing for "EU Trian Deal".
If we check this box manually, client is satisfied as they get this in intrastat report (VE01).
The VAT tax calculation and all is OK.
The requirement is to make this check box "EU Trian Deal" automatically in case of EU triangulation deal.
Any idea, if this can be done with standard SAP?
Please ask me, if you need further requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Praveen
Plant A=Company Code 2000
Plant B=Company Code 1000
Need your help with an inter company issue. Shipments were made from Plant A to Plant B in July. These shipments in the end should record and inter company receivable on A entity and an inter company payable on Plant B Entity. The inter company payable to A did not happen in SAP. We are not sure why. I believe this was done as an STO and Plant B did process the receipt of the material.
Before this it never happened as
Usually Plant A purchases from Plant B and not the other way around. So this time it is different.
So how do we correct this in terms configuration.
Thank You
Hrushikesh
Dear experts
We have sales area wise credit control area
i have assinged dummy cca to company code
assinged sales area wise cca
assinged permitted cca to company code
everything is working fine. but Fi consultant at the time of intial upload of balances he has uploaded balance against dummy credit control area.
we have maintianed division wise credit limit in fd32.
the balance which they uploaded is not showing up in receavables in fd32.
instead of uploading the balances credit control area wise they have uploaded with dummy cca.
Pl give a solution how to go-ahead.
regards
AJITh
Dear Experts,
When final settlement is being done to a extended rebate agreement, Getting the below error. - Customer master table KNA1 is missing. Message number is VF021.
The customer master does exist and I have also carried out all the transactions. Even the rebate agreement has updated sales volume.
Any inputs please.
Dear Experts,
I have observed that in the cancelled billing document the update group is updated is 1. the original bill which was cancelled also have update group 1.
now i want to know how to correct it because this is wrong for surely, if both original and cancel bill has update group 1 then my billing data will come wrong in SIS.
also i have seen after cancelling the bill somebody has deleted the sales order ( because it was in showing open order), does this is causing the wrong update?
Dear Gurus,
We have an issue where we need to update the open billing documents (More than 90 ) which are not released to accounting as CLOSED.
The billing documents were not released to accounting due to some Costing not done for the materials and they are open in
system.
Client doesn't want to cancel the billing documents as these billing documents are more than 6 months old.
Is there an option in SAP ECC 6. 0 version like the V_MACO - Manual completion of Sales Documents and VL_COMPLETE - Completion of deliveries
for Closing the Open Billing documents.
Regards,
S.RK